Monday, 11 October 2021

John Milton

Hello I am Emisha Ravani.today I am dealing with the very important figure of the puritan age who is 'John Milton'. Milton has same consideration as Shakespeare has in the English literature because Shakespeare and Milton are the two figures who has made English literature famous. Each is representative of age that and together they form a suggestive commentary upon the two forces that rule our humanity- the force of impulse and force of a fixed purpose. Shakespeare is the poet of impulse, the loves, fears, Jealousies, and ambitions that swayed man of his age. Milton is the poet of steadfast will and purpose ,who moves like a God amid the fears and the hopes and Changing impulses of the world ,regarding them as trivial and momentary things that can never swerve a great soul from it course.

JOHN MILTON
Time Line: 1608- 1674

Milton's Life :

Milton is like an ideal in the soul ,like a lofty after mountain on the Horizon . We never attained ideal , we never climb the mountain but life would be expressibly poorer were either to be taken away. In character the elder Milton was a rare combination of scholar and businessman, medical puritan in politics and religion, great musician, whose tunes are Steel song, a lover of art and literature. Poet mother was a woman of refinement and social grass deep interest in religion and in a local charities. So the boy grew up in a home which combine the culture of the Renaissance with the piety and moral strength of early puritanism.Two things of personal interest deserve mention in this period of milton's life, his marriage and his blindness.


Notable Works: “A Treatise on Christian Doctrine” “Areopagitica” “Artis Logicae” “Comus” “Defense of the English People Against Salmasius” “Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, The” “Eikonoklastes” “History of Britain” “Il Penseroso” “L’Allegro” “Lycidas” “Of Education” “Of Reformation Touching Church Discipline in England” “On Shakespeare” “On the Fifth of November” “On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity” “Paradise Lost” “Paradise Regained” “Samson Agonistes” “The Second Defense of the English People by John Milton, Englishman, in Reply to an Infamous Book Entitled “Cry of the King’s Blood”” “The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates” 

Milton is best known for Paradise Lost, widely regarded as the greatest epic poem in English. Together with Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes, it confirms Milton’s reputation as one of the greatest English poets. In his prose works Milton advocated the abolition of the Church of England and the execution of Charles I. From the beginning of the English Civil Wars in 1642 to long after the restoration of Charles II as king in 1660, he espoused in all his works a political philosophy that opposed tyranny and state-sanctioned religion. His influence extended not only through the civil wars and interregnum but also to the American and French revolutions. In his works on theology, he valued liberty of conscience, the paramount importance of Scripture as a guide in matters of faith, and religious toleration toward dissidents. As a civil servant, Milton became the voice of the English Commonwealth after 1649 through his handling of its international correspondence and his defense of the government against polemical attacks from abroad.

John Milton
Paradise Lost
Abandoning his earlier plan to compose an epic on Arthur, Milton instead turned to biblical subject matter and to a Christian idea of heroism. In Paradise Lost—first published in 10 books in 1667 and then in 12 books in 1674, at a length of almost 11,000 lines—Milton observed but adapted a number of the Classical epic conventions that distinguish works such as Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey and Virgil’s The Aeneid. 


Milton's Paradise Lost 

Among these conventions is a focus on the elevated subjects of war, love, and heroism. In Book 6 Milton describes the battle between the good and evil angels; the defeat of the latter results in their expulsion from heaven. In the battle, the Son (Jesus Christ) is invincible in his onslaught against Satan and his cohorts. But Milton’s emphasis is less on the Son as a warrior and more on his love for humankind; the Father, in his celestial dialogue with the Son, foresees the sinfulness of Adam and Eve, and the Son chooses to become incarnate and to suffer humbly to redeem them. Though his role as saviour of fallen humankind is not enacted in the epic, Adam and Eve before their expulsion from Eden learn of the future redemptive ministry of Jesus, the exemplary gesture of self-sacrificing love. The Son’s selfless love contrasts strikingly with the selfish love of the heroes of Classical epics, who are distinguished by their valour on the battlefield, which is usually incited by pride and vainglory. Their strength and skills on the battlefield and their acquisition of the spoils of war also issue from hate, anger, revenge, greed, and covetousness. If Classical epics deem their protagonists heroic for their extreme passions, even vices, the Son in Paradise Lost exemplifies Christian heroism both through his meekness and magnanimity and through his patience and fortitude.

Sing Heav’nly Muse, that on the secret top
Of Horeb, or of Sinai, didst inspire
That shepherd, who first taught the chosen seed,
In the beginning how the heav’ns and earth
Rose out of chaos; or if Sion hill
Delight thee more, and Siloa’s brook that flowed
Fast by the oracle of God: I thence
Invoke thy aid to my advent’rous song,
That with no middle flight intends to soar
Above the Aonian mount, while it pursues
Things unattempted yet in prose or rhyme.
This muse is the Judaeo-Christian Godhead. Citing manifestations of the Godhead atop Horeb and Sinai, Milton seeks inspiration comparable to that visited upon Moses, to whom is ascribed the composition of the book of Genesis. Much as Moses was inspired to recount what he did not witness, so also Milton seeks inspiration to write about biblical events. Recalling Classical epics, in which the haunts of the muses are not only mountaintops but also waterways, Milton cites Siloa’s brook, where in the New Testament a blind man acquired sight after going there to wash off the clay and spittle placed over his eyes by Jesus. Likewise, Milton seeks inspiration to enable him to envision and narrate events to which he and all human beings are blind unless chosen for enlightenment by the Godhead. With his reference to “the Aonian mount,” or Mount Helicon in Greece, Milton deliberately invites comparison with Classical antecedents. He avers that his work will supersede these predecessors and will accomplish what has not yet been achieved: a biblical epic in English.

Paradise Lost also directly invokes Classical epics by beginning its action in medias res. Book 1 recounts the aftermath of the war in heaven, which is described only later, in Book 6. At the outset of the epic, the consequences of the loss of the war include the expulsion of the fallen angels from heaven and their descent into hell, a place of infernal torment. With the punishment of the fallen angels having been described early in the epic, Milton in later books recounts how and why their disobedience occurred. Disobedience and its consequences, therefore, come to the fore in Raphael’s instruction of Adam and Eve, who (especially in Books 6 and 8) are admonished to remain obedient. By examining the sinfulness of Satan in thought and in deed, Milton positions this part of his narrative close to the temptation of Eve. This arrangement enables Milton to highlight how and why Satan, who inhabits a serpent to seduce Eve in Book 9, induces in her the inordinate pride that brought about his own downfall. Satan arouses in Eve a comparable state of mind, which is enacted in her partaking of the forbidden fruit, an act of disobedience.


Paradise Lost is ultimately not only about the downfall of Adam and Eve but also about the clash between Satan and the Son. Many readers have admired Satan’s splendid recklessness, if not heroism, in confronting the Godhead. Satan’s defiance, anger, willfulness, and resourcefulness define a character who strives never to yield. In many ways Satan is heroic when compared to such Classical prototypes as Achilles, Odysseus, and Aeneas and to similar protagonists in medieval and Renaissance epics. In sum, his traits reflect theirs.

But Milton composed a biblical epic in order to debunk Classical heroism and to extol Christian heroism, exemplified by the Son. Notwithstanding his victory in the battle against the fallen angels, the Son is more heroic because he is willing to undergo voluntary humiliation, a sign of his consummate love for humankind. He foreknows that he will become incarnate in order to suffer death, a selfless act whereby humankind will be redeemed. By such an act, moreover, the Son fulfills what Milton calls the “great argument” of his poem: to “justify the ways of God to man,” as Milton writes in Book 1. Despite Satan’s success against Adam and Eve, the hope of regeneration after sinfulness is provided by the Son’s self-sacrifice. Such hope and opportunity enable humankind to cooperate with the Godhead so as to defeat Satan, avoid damnation, overcome death, and ascend heavenward. Satan’s wiles, therefore, are thwarted by members of a regenerate humankind who choose to participate in the redemptive act that the Son has undertaken on their behalf. 

Emisha ravani
mkbu, dept of English







Saturday, 9 October 2021

' Lockdown' by Simon Armitage


Simon Armitage

An English poet, playwright and novelist He was appointed poet laureate on 10 May 2019.He is also professor of poetry at the University of Leeds and succeeded Geoffrey Hill as Oxford Professor of Poetry. 


Lockdown by Simon Armitage

And I couldn’t escape the waking dream
of infected fleas
in the warp and weft of soggy cloth
by the tailor’s hearth
in ye olde Eyam.
Then couldn’t un-see
the Boundary Stone,
that cock-eyed dice with its six dark holes,
thimbles brimming with vinegar wine
purging the plagued coins.
Which brought to mind the sorry story
of Emmott Syddall and Rowland Torre,
star-crossed lovers on either side
of the quarantine line
whose wordless courtship spanned the river
till she came no longer.
But slept again,
and dreamt this time
of the exiled yaksha sending word
to his lost wife on a passing cloud,
a cloud that followed an earthly map
of camel trails and cattle tracks,
streams like necklaces,
fan-tailed peacocks, painted elephants,
embroidered bedspreads
of meadows and hedges,
bamboo forests and snow-hatted peaks,
waterfalls, creeks,
the hieroglyphs of wide-winged cranes
and the glistening lotus flower after rain,
the air
hypnotically see-through, rare,
the journey a ponderous one at times, long and slow
but necessarily so.



Simon Armitage has written a poem to address the coronavirus and a lockdown that is slowly being implemented across the UK, saying that the art form can be consoling in times of crisis because it “asks us just to focus, and think, and be contemplative”.The poet laureate’s new poem, Lockdown, moves from the outbreak of bubonic plague in Eyam in the 17th century, when a bale of cloth from London brought fleas carrying the plague to the Derbyshire village, to the epic poem Meghaduta by the Sanskrit poet Kalidas. 
Armitage, who is at home with his family in West Yorkshire, said that “as the lockdown became more apparent and it felt like the restrictions were closing in, the plague in Eyam became more and more resonant” to him.
His poem references Eyam’s boundary stone, which contained holes that the quarantined villagers would put their money in to pay for provisions from outside, and then fill with vinegar in the hope it would cleanse the coins. It also touches on the doomed romance between a girl who lived in Eyam and a boy outside the village who talked to her from a distance, until she stopped coming.
A man touches the boundary stone in Eyam from which no resident could pass during the village’s isolation in 1666.
The poem was also influenced by a scene in Meghadata in which an exile sends reassuring words to his wife in the Himalayas via a passing cloud.
“The cloud is convinced to take the message because the yaksha, which I think is sort of an attendant spirit to a god of wealth, tells him what amazing landscapes and scenery he’s going to pass across. I thought it was a kind of hopeful, romantic gesture,” said Armitage.





Movie Review - Frankenstein

Hello, I'm Emisha Ravani.here I'm presenting a movie review of 'Mary Shelley's Frankenstein'. Accordingly I'll go with first poster of the movie then cast , information about production of movie , briefly story , vivid concepts which are portrayed in the movie, and the video. 


The poster of the movie Mary Shelly's Frankenstein


Cast :


Robert De Niro as The Creation

Kenneth Branagh as Victor Frankenstein
Tom Hulce as Henry Clerva 
Helena Bonham Carter as Elizabeth Lavenza Frankenstein
Ian Holm as Baron Alphonse Frankenstein
John Cleese as Professor Waldman 
Aidan Quinn as Captain Robert Walton
Richard Briers as Grandfather ( blind man) 
Robert Hardy as Professor Krempe
Trevyn McDowell as Justine Moritz


Directed by - Kenneth Branagh
Screenplay by- Steph lady, Frank Darabont
Produced by - Francis Ford Coppola, James V. Hart
Cinematography - Roger Pratt
Edited by - Andrew Marcus
Language - English


Story in brief:


This story is happened in 1794, Captain Walton leads a troubled expedition to reach the North Pole. While their ship is trapped in the ice of the Arctic Sea,The crew discovers a man, Victor Frankenstein, traveling across the Arctic on his own. Victor proceeds to tell Walton and the crew his life story, presented as a flashback.

Victor grows up in Geneva with his adopted sister, Elizabeth Lavenza, who will become the love of his life. Before he leaves for the university at Ingolstadt, Victor's mother dies giving birth to his brother William. Traumatized by grief afterward, Victor vows on his mother's grave that he will find a way to conquer death. However, he is shunned by his peers, who view him as a madman. Eventually, Victor and his friend Henry Clerval meet Shmael Augustus Waldman, a professor whose notes contain information on how to create life; Waldman warns Victor not to use them lest he create an "abomination."


Victor builds a creature based on the professor's notes. He is so obsessed with his work that he drives Elizabeth away when she comes to take him away as Ingolstadt is being put into quarantine. Victor finally gives his creation life, but soon regrets his decision and tries to kill it with an axe; the creature steals his coat and is driven away by the townspeople when it tries to steal food.


The creature escapes, running off into the wilderness. He spends months living in a family's barn without their knowledge, gradually learning to read and speak based on observations and memories from Waldman's brain. He attempts to earn the family's trust by anonymously helping them with their failing farm, and eventually converses with the patriarch, an elderly blind man, after murdering an abusive debt collector. However, when the blind man's family returns, they attack the creature and abandon their farm. The creature finds Victor's journal in his coat and learns of the circumstances of his creation. He burns down the farm and vows revenge on his creator.


Victor, who believes the creature to be dead from the cholera epidemic, returns to Geneva to marry Elizabeth. He finds his younger brother William has been murdered. Justine, a servant of the Frankenstein household, is inadvertently framed for the crime by the creature and hanged by a lynch mob before her trial. The creature abducts Victor and demands that he make a companion for him, promising to leave his creator in peace in return. Victor begins gathering the tools he used to create life, but when the creature insists that he use Justine's body to make the companion, Victor breaks his promise and the creature exacts his revenge, strangling Victor's father and tearing out Elizabeth's heart.


Maddened with grief, Victor races home to bring Elizabeth back to life. There, he finds Henry, who tells him he should let Elizabeth rest in peace. Victor stitches Elizabeth's head onto Justine's fully intact body, and she awakes as a re-animated creature. The two are briefly and happily reunited until the creature appears, demanding Elizabeth as his bride. Victor and the creature fight for Elizabeth's affections, but Elizabeth, horrified by what she has become, commits suicide by setting herself on fire. Both Victor and the creature escape as the mansion burns down.


The story returns to the Arctic. Victor tells Walton that he has been pursuing his creation for months to kill him. Soon after relating his story, Victor dies from pneumonia. Walton discovers the creature weeping over Victor's body, confessing that for all of his hatred, he still considers Victor to be his "father." The crew prepares a funeral pyre, but the ceremony is interrupted when the ice around the ship cracks. Walton invites the creature to stay with the ship, but the creature insists on remaining with the pyre. He takes the torch and burns himself alive with Victor's body. Walton, having seen the consequences of Victor's obsession, orders the ship to return home.




Various concepts in movie:


  • The concept of deformity
  • The concept of outer beauty and inner beauty
  • Psychological approach
  • Scientific approach
  • The concept of society's thinking process
  • The concept of false parametersknowledg
  • Quest for knowledge



Emisha ravani
mkbu.dept. of english







Friday, 8 October 2021

questions- answers of Frankenstein novel

Questions - Answers of novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley


1.why Victor was not able to accept his dream experiment and it's results? 


Ans: Ultimately, victor's life is little miserable here. When his mother died he decided to create human being he went to University. There he used to keep doing experiments with dead bodies. After too much struggle he made a body alive which is huge in size and very weird in look.
Then he thought about his dream of creation of human being it seems too difficult for his professor. Though he did level of hard work suddenly he got result that body was alive but because of horrible appearance and sudden result victor was not able to accept his dream and the result of experience. As the main reason of unacceptance power is very sudden success. 



2. What made creature a monster?


Ans: Creature is the creation of victor so hopefully when creature got alive creature long for acceptance and love because the father of creature is the victor. Here we consider the creature and the victor as the son and father. But as creator's ignorance and hatred is playing vital role to made creature a monster. 
Also society play a role here like from beginning creature only started to get bad experiences from society. Society made creature to feel awkward all the time. And also make him to be rejection because he is strange look only. 


3. Why Society has rejected Victor's idea of experiment and then the result of his experiment?


Vary significantly people are believing that to give a birth or to create a human being is a process which can be done by only God. Human cannot create other human that's what people are believing strong determination of Victor to create human being and to get experiment of that is upset action for society. Society has rejected result of his experiment to get this idea we can apply here the formalistic view. That house society has believe that creature has deformation.



4. Can appearance overpower reality?


Ans: Yes, we live in a society where appearance matters a lot than the reality. Now reality is something else that the creature was like a child who is not aware about this false criterias of society or the parameters of the society. And also he was like a child who is very innocent towards society but how society behaves towards the creature is converted the creature into monster. The process itself done by the force or the centralisation of the society. 
the action of Society and thought process affected a lot to creature in this process. 



5. Who decides what beauty is? Is it for real or superficial?


Ans: Here the conflict between outer beauty and inner beauty is considerable. Society always preferred or the judge people by the outer beauty. Normally they used to make different parameters to measure outer beauty of person. 
We can say that the inner beauty is more difficult to see than the outer beauty and it is the process which everyone cannot see. Inner beauty is something like real and the out outer beauty is like superficial. A person can be horrible by the appearance but he can have sensible heart.

Emisha ravani
mkbu,dept.english